Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Shane vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shane vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Shane vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shane 1 - 0 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shane has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 47.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shane, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shane has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 58.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shane has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zandschulp winning 47.27% (W/L 26/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shane has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 52/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shane winning 1 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shane winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Shane and Zandschulp was at the M25 Barnstaple, 13-02-2019, Second, I.hard with Ryan Shane getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shane and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shane winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shane winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shane has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 174.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shane has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shane has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
897
Rank
333
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
99
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
54% (132-112)
Career Total W/L
63% (332-198)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
41% (12-17)
$17,295
Career Prize Money
$2,900,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shane VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Ryan Shane | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (21/41) | 59% (26/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (18/21) | 73% (19/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (14/20) | 33% (6/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (19/44) | 22% (9/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Shane VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Ryan Shane
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
51
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Shane | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (12/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (27/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (302/344) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 124 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:47:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 185.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1275/2038) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (869/1275) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (360/763) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (70/183) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (781/2053) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (12/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 6% (17/1) |
Ryan Shane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Ryan Shane
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
29
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
10
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Leanid Boika
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
33%
(
16 of
49)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Felix Corwin
54%
(
56 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
12
Aces
4
13
Double Faults
9
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
35%
(
17 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Justin Roberts
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
6
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
10
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Ryan Shane
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Taha Baadi
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
10
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fnu Nidunjianzan
Player
Ryan Shane
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shane Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Shane are available here and Zandschulp photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
